Helpline No.: +91 6262624121
19 April 2022
Posted By Vidhik Shiksha
In the case of Kamatchi vs Lakshmi Narayanan, Supreme Court has held that the limitation period prescribed under Section 468 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is not applicable for the filing of an application…
15 April 2022
While listening to the appeal in the case of Mafat Lal & Anr. Versus The State Of Rajasthan, the Supreme Court bench comprising of Justices S. Abdul Nazeer and Vikram Nath observed that an offence…
12 April 2022
Recently, the High Court of Allahabad refused to grant direction for anticipatory bail to a person accused under the POCSO Act of allegedly raping a minor girl and her mother(the informant). The Court stated that…
11 April 2022
In the case of Ramachandran @ Chandran v State of Kerala, a Division Bench of Justices A Muhamed Mustaque and Dr. Kauser Edappagath was hearing an appeal moved by a man against the order of…
9 April 2022
Recently, the High Court Of Madhya Pradesh directed a Government Medical College to issue an appointment letter to the Petitioner as she was the successful candidate who got selected as the Assistant Professor in the…
7 April 2022
Recently in the Rajya Sabha, on being asked a question by the BJP Member of Parliament Dr. Ashok Bajpai, the Union Law Minister Kiren Rijiju listed the benefits and facilities provided by the virtual hearing…
6 April 2022
In a rare instance, the Bombay High Court bench in Aurangabad upheld a couple of orders passed by a local court situated in Nanded. The order directed the wife, who was a school teacher, to…
2 April 2022
The division bench consisting of Justices Sheel Nagu and M.S. Bhatti of the Madhya Pradesh High Court recently upheld its decision of not interfering with the order passed by the Disciplinary Authority, directing compulsory retirement…
1 April 2022
The petitioners- NGO Sampada Grameen Mahila Sanstha and Community Based Organisation Muskan Sanstha, along with transpersons Vinayak Kashid (29) and Arya (22) have filed the PIL recently before the Bombay High Court. The PIL read,…
31 March 2022
Recently, Justice Uday Umesh Lalit who is the judge of Supreme Court and the Executive Chairman of the National Legal Services Authority, while addressing the judges, Lawyers and Legal Services provider, has stressed the need…
In the case of Kamatchi vs Lakshmi Narayanan, Supreme Court has held that the limitation period prescribed under Section 468 […]
While listening to the appeal in the case of Mafat Lal & Anr. Versus The State Of Rajasthan, the Supreme […]
Recently, the High Court of Allahabad refused to grant direction for anticipatory bail to a person accused under the POCSO […]
In the case of Ramachandran @ Chandran v State of Kerala, a Division Bench of Justices A Muhamed Mustaque and […]
Recently, the High Court Of Madhya Pradesh directed a Government Medical College to issue an appointment letter to the Petitioner […]
19 April 2022
Posted By Vidhik Shiksha
Helpline No.: +91 6262624121
: +91 6262624121 (Call & Whatsapp)
: